Hannah Anderson: Is She Complicit, or Manipulated?
I don't know about the rest of you but I am starting to have some doubts about the alleged kidnapping of Hannah Anderson by her Uncle Jim. I have this gut feeling that this young woman is not telling the whole story. In addition when I first saw her picture and every picture of her ever since, I get a bad feeling: there is something wrong with this girl and she played a bigger role, and may not be so innocent.
Some of you might find me off, and that is okay, this is only my opinion, but when I watched the Dr. Drew Show this evening, one young woman, a conservative talk show host and blogger, stated that she too is wondering if Hannah is actually innocent. People chided her for this, but this time I agree with a conservative viewpoint.
I am not blaming Hannah, but I do ask this question. Why did she call her Uncle Jim several times the day before she was kidnapped? I don't think she is totally innocent. I am not saying that she is guilty of anything, but I wonder what her friendship really was like, with this man? In addition, the police found Hannah's retainer at her Uncle Jim's home. That is a bit strange. Also, how do we know whether it really was the Uncle who murdered Hannah's mother and her brother? We don't. Isn't it also possible that Hannah was the one who murdered her mother and brother? It may be hard to believe that but it is possible. After I heard that Jim had called Hannah and she had called him a total of six or more times the day of or day before the kidnapping, that got my bells ringing too!
The alleged kidnapper is dead, but law enforcement has not done there job if they don't do a complete investigation. I understand that the majority of American TV viewers are often infatuated by the kidnapped or missing pretty little blonde girl, but we have to examine all sides of this story.